Wednesday, 4 May 2016

CONQUERING TINDER - Reasons You Should Delete Your Profile Pic And Replace It With This:

It’s been a weird week. My kid turned 2 and it made me think about the strangeness of having most life fundamentals wrapped up at the age of 24; husband, house, relatively photogenic children prime for lording it over people on social media. Most people I went to school with are still braving the brutalities of the dating scene and I find myself overlooking their romantic ventures with a kind of morbid curiosity.

Back in the days when I was on the prowl, meeting your other half on the internet was just not something you admitted to. It was like the romance equivalent of peeing in the shower; we all know it goes on, you might have even tried it yourself, but there’s no way you’re fessing up to it.

How times have changed. Tinder, my friends.

For those of you who don’t know what Tinder is, it works like this:


Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 10.34.55.png


And almost everyone single person I know has dabbled with it.

For those using it as a dating platform, it works a lot like browsing the Argos catalogue for Christmas presents as a kid. You flip through, circling the stuff (people) you want and - if you’re lucky - it’ll turn up under the tree on the day. Much like tearing off the first layer of paper on your Scuba Patrol Action Man figure, scoring an ‘It’s a Match!’ notification is just the beginning. Before you can play with your new friend, you have to unwrap them. There are the endless sandwich bag ties, the superfluous cardboard reinforcements swaddled in sticky tape, the plastic sheath with the impenetrability of a presidential-grade windshield. Establishing a connection takes effort, and nowhere more so than through the sterility of a messenger app. So what do you do in the absence of body language, pheromones and the dulcet tones of Tinie Tempah to set the scene? How do you make a lasting (positive) impression? Do you laboriously unpick every defence (*insert carefully constructed opening paragraph referencing every interest mentioned in their bio*) or hack at the situation with a kitchen knife (*hey, here’s a joke about my genitals*)?

Being the budding investigative journalist that I am, I decided to find out.




I created a profile using a pseudonym and a largely unrecognisable picture of my fine 19 year old self, intending to unearth what the men of the world had to offer in terms of opening lines. Really, that’s what this post was supposed to be about - a carefully curated selection of opening moves designed to give my loyal readership (all two of you) an insight into the dos and don’ts of Tinder introductions. And don’t worry - a gallery of carefully selected specimens will follow later this week. I’m not having you miss out the poetical stylings of John the ‘artisan bread restaurant owner’ or spending the rest of your days ignorant to what the difference between jam and jelly is (don’t Google the answer if your nan’s around). But for now, let’s talk about the (slightly creepy) hack I’ve found to efficiently find your soulmate and combat the inherent superficiality of the Tindering process.

After my unsuspecting participants had hit me with their opening line I explained that I was actually married with kids and just there to conduct research. For some people, that was conversation over, but most were happy to stick around awhile and discuss their experiences of online dating. There were some interesting findings.

Firstly, Tinder has a reputation for being exclusively the domain of people looking for hookups/casual sex. And that’s definitely something a lot of guys on there are open to. That being said, I spoke to around 600 men over 3 days and two - only two - said they were looking for casual sex and nothing else. Every single other guy, even the ones primarily looking for le sexy time, would have welcomed something more serious as a result of ‘matching’ with someone. Returning to discussion with real-life friends, it’s apparent Tinder does work as a platform for establishing serious relationships. I know people who’ve met the love of their life through Tinder. I know people who got MARRIED because one serendipitous afternoon they both swiped right.

So this left me considering, how can you streamline the process of finding a quality relationship on Tinder? There must be some way to economically assess who’s looking for something substantial and who’s going to waste 3 hours of your time convincing you they’re the ‘pre-date interview with your Pa and have you home by ten’ type, only to send you an unsolicited pic of their junk as soon as they’ve coaxed a number out of you.

Turns out there is. And it involves you replacing your profile pictures with something like this:


No pics of you looking ‘bubbly’ on your holiday to Magaluf. No blurb about how ‘down to earth’ and ‘fun loving’ you are. Just an invitation.

I stumbled upon this technique after a conversation I had with a Tinder interviewee who ended up being subjected to my life story and various philosophisings about art and life. There was the understanding that I was on there for research - the name, the age and (really) the pic were not me. I could have easily been a Danny Devito lookalike with chronic trimethylaminuria and a proclivity for spam and pickle sandwiches. There was nothing to lose and nothing to gain for either participant. And actually, that led to probably the best conversation I’ve ever had with a stranger.  

At one point, he said this to me: ‘I don’t think I’ve ever told anyone this. But why not someone completely removed from my life.’ And so this got me thinking. If the premise of anonymity can bring about a conversation of this quality, could that be applied to every Tinder interaction? A profile picture and a list of life achievements can create serious expectations and high stakes. What happens if you ditch the baggage that comes with a profile pic and just engage blindly?

So I deleted my pics and replaced them with my little Paddington Bear number. I was unambitious. I indiscriminately swiped right to a hundred people and expected a return of up to five.

Sixty. 

Sixty people who took a chance and swiped right to a luggage tag. As an actual face I got a return of about 80%. That’s right. A grotty piece of paper got nearly as many likes as my actual face.

To be fair, I expected those who took the bait to be the kind of guys for whom there is a precedent of being more romantically successful with inanimate objects than with actual people. But the conversations were incredible. The people who were primarily looking for sex lost interest immediately; they asked for a photo straight away and when I said ‘that kind of defeats the purpose’, they couldn’t wrap their little heads around it. “But how do I know if I want to speak to you or not??”. “How am I supposed to know if you’re interesting or not without seeing what you look like?”. They unmatched me, and left behind were people who were curious, kind, educated, well rounded, attractive and willing to engage.

We spoke about stuff that really mattered. And because they couldn’t see me, there was no posturing, no agenda-driven filter. Just an honest conversation. Ok, maybe ‘honest’ is just conjecture on my part. But I do know this - if I was looking for a partner I would be confident these people were interested in me for my brains above my bones.

I’m not really sure what drives a person to take a chance like that. I guess it's partly the same impulse that makes us click on the links promising to reveal the '10 historical photos you were never meant to see' or 'what happened to this mum of 8 when she made one fatal mistake with a mouldy kitchen sponge'. But for a lot of people I think they just genuinely believed that attraction transcends the purely physical. Speaking to one guy about why he’d swiped right, he said this:




And I guess he's right. The frame should complement the work of art, but it's not the main attraction.

I’m not saying physical attraction isn’t important. It’s essential. And Tinder is an amazing tool. It widens your pool of social interaction probably more than any other resource available. But physical attraction can develop over time and Tinder doesn’t make any allowance for that. My own husband was an instant ‘ew’, and now I’m all over the guy.

In short, if you are single, if you are a curious creature and if you love finding people to love, I challenge you to do 2 things this week:

1. Swipe right to at least 1 person you wouldn’t usually consider. I was amazed by the interactions that came from people I would have written off as “too laddish”, “too blah” or “too up themselves”.

and

2. Trade your profile pic for an invitation for a day. There's always a risk you'll establish an amazing connection with someone who decides you're not for them when you finally reveal yourself. But really, isn't that always the case? 

Take a chance.

Friday, 1 April 2016

8 Baby Gifts Parents Won’t Hate You For Buying

It’s the thought that counts, but not all gifts are created equal... Here's a handy guide to choosing a present that parents will thank you for - and not just out of politeness


1. Sleeping Bag
All new parents are paranoia-stricken hot damn messes when it comes to putting their babies down for the night.

“What if a cloud of nitrogen silently sneaks its way into his room and disrupts the chemical composition of the air?”
“What if she gets too clammy and drowns in a puddle of her own sweat?”  
“What if a large bird of prey glides in through an open window, scoops him up and raises him as its own?”
- merely a few of the totally legit ponderings that occur to first (and second and third) time baby raisers. One thing that makes night time a little less stressful (especially in colder months) are teenytiny sleeping bags like this:


They help babies feel snuggly and cozy while eliminating the parental stress of worrying about the fatal hypothermia they’ll contract from kicking their covers off during the night.

2. Bouncer Chair
In marathon running there is a phenomenon referred to as ‘hitting the wall’ - a period of fatigue so intense it feels like your body has turned 100% defector and is manifesting its open hatred towards you by secretly swapping your limbs with those of a paraplegic elephant. This phenomenon is also common to parenthood at around the 36 hour mark. At this point your body will decide a definitive ‘nope nope nope’ to the endless bouncing, rocking, patting and parading required to keep a freshly born human appeased. Give them a bouncer chair. For the love of all that is good, give those poor parents a bouncer chair and 10 minutes relief. Whether it’s an all singing, all dancing, self propelling, airport-style massage chair number like this one:



Or a modest, mildly buzzy little manual rocker like this one:



The relief is intense. Gratitude guaranteed.

3. Boys/Girls Nightie
Ah the dreaded nighttime nappy change. Baby pajamas are 24 cutesy inches of popper hell - specifically designed to drive the already fraught parent properly over the edge. Correctly aligning poppers in the semi-dark is a bit like being on Crystal Maze, except instead of winning an adventure holiday you win 30 mins of silence and a brief nap. Should you fail to complete the task before your child is properly awake however, you will be penalised with the dreaded ‘scream-poop’ lock down in which you are caught in a neverending cycle of your child shrieking maniacally until exhausted and then immediately farting themselves awake again. This can be sidestepped with a popper-free sleepsuit nightie from Lucy & Sam. There are millions of adorable, totally useless outfits on the market, but this is one is a newborn essential. 



4. Ribbon Rings
‘Something colourful and shiny I can shake about like a demented baton twirler and safely stuff in my mouth? Sign me up!’ - said every baby ever. Ok this is a shameless plug as I know the person who makes these (c’est moi!). But that also means I can testify they are made of 100% organic maplewood and tummy safe beeswax and that small humans do properly love them (mine do anyway - even two years on). Stock is running low, but you can check ‘em out here https://www.etsy.com/uk/shop/TheLittleRibbonShop.







5. JellyCat Soft Toys
“Oh a little teddy! How adorable!”. Hah, you’d think so, but after 24 hours with a baby that badboy will be more basted in bodily fluids than a Sunday roast. Rabbit, hippo, unicorn - it mattereth not. You stick a batch of soft toys in the washer/dryer and they’ll come out the other end looking like a drowned rat. JellyCat teddies are different. They withstand endless washings and still come out feeling soft, fluffy and looking shop fresh. And there are hundreds of gorgeous ones to choose from, thus satisfying my inner 5 year old http://www.jellycat.com/




6. Muslins  
You’d be forgiven for thinking this is a really lame ass present (“A packet of rags? Oh you naughty thing, you really are spoiling us!”), but they are seriously the most useful gift ever. Aside from the standard baby-related uses (bodily fluid mop, nappy mat, lampshade, sunshade, comforter, blanket, chew toy, boob shield, stink wafter) they can be used for a ton of other stuff - a shield when ironing delicate clothing, a sieve when making homemade paneer and a prop whilst performing the dance of the seven veils (partic' useful when you're angling for your partner to consent to yet another night of ordering dinner in). We once burned through 12 in a day, so you can never have too many. The slightly bigger ones are better in my opinion and you can't beat a nautical print -



7. Fabric Books  
TRUE FACT: children are referred to as ‘kids’ because the spirit animal of every human baby is a disgruntled hungry goat. If your baby doesn’t have an obsession with eating books/toiletpaper/anything tree based, secure yourself in your bathroom and contact the authorities. You are a victim of alien impregnation.
Babies love to get their hands on a book, but their literal appetite for the written word makes a copy of Shakespeare’s sonnets somewhat impractical. Fabric books are the bessst. Impervious to toothless wonders and you can shove them in the washing machine following their inevitable baptism by faecal matter. Bought this one for my kid awhile back and I'm devastated they’ve stopped making them before I could acquire Jules Verne’s entire back catalogue... (Heaven forbid my two year old should become a fan of Spot the Dog...) But yeah, plenty of alternatives to be found on t’internet.


8. Something just for the Parents
Tiny Gucci slingbacks are cute and everything, but at 4am on your fifth consecutive night of 2 hours sleep you would quite happily trade in your offspring’s (adorable but superfluous) 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th pair of £60 designer booties for a tube of Smarties and a sixpack of Red Bull. In short, forgo the microfashion in favour of a gift that makes parental life less brutal. Buy them cake. Buy them poop-blasting scented candles. Buy them takeaway vouchers and dry shampoo and anything with enough caffeine in it to wake the recently dead (Cooking from scratch? Lol. Daily showers? Lol. ‘Make sure you’re getting enough rest!” Looooooool). Happy parent = happy baby.

A chocolate fudge cake a day keeps the babyblues away.


And finally,


2 BABY GIFTS YOU SHOULD NEVER EVER EVER BUY.

1. Bath Crayons
When half of my relatives bought my children bath crayons for Christmas I thought ‘Brilliant! Mess that’s confined to the a room full of wipeable surfaces? What's not to love?'. Ha. I don't care how bright your baby is, "darling, it's fine to draw on this wall, but if you draw on a wall anywhere else in the house, mummy will have a meltdown" is not an instruction any child under 3 will assimilate (or will admit to assimilating anyway...).



2. Anything that makes an unholy amount of noise.
Buying a baby a noisy toy is like sending your IBS-suffering kid off on a school trip with a packed lunch of baked beans and chicken vindaloo. It’s just not the done thing. Babies are professional noise makers so, as they say, ‘leave it to the professionals’.

If your kid looks like this, then they won't be the only one screaming.



If you have any wisdom/recommendations of your own to add, leave you know what to do! 


vvv comment section, ahem vvv

Tuesday, 29 March 2016

The Dirty V Word

This week I dropped the V-bomb and disclosed to my friends and family that for the foreseeable future I’m going to be… wait for it... partially vegan-vegetarian. Their response was suspicion, derision, hilarity  - all the things you’d expect when you make a life change intended to better yourself and the planet at large.



I’m not quite sure why people are so excruciatingly uncomfortable with the idea of someone cutting various foodstuffs out of their diet, but one thing is for sure - it’s not a move you make if you’re trying to boost your street cred. There’s this notion that V’s (vegans/vegetarians) are preachy, self righteous hippy types who just don’t get how the real world functions. Maybe they are. You know who else they said that about? Anti-slavery campaigners. People who choose to cut out unethically-produced animal products are told that ‘your lifestyle choices will never change the system’, that ‘it’s just how the world works’ and that ‘people’s livelihoods are dependent on it being this way’. This is not the first time these arguments have been used to justify a morally questionable practise. And you know what? Things did change, people found other ways to make a living and the world didn’t stop spinning.

Unlike a lot of V-inclined individuals I’m not actually opposed to the idea of eating meat in and of itself. To be honest, I think eating meat is just part of the circle of life. Massinyahi'meatinabanana and all that. What I cannot get onboard with, however, is this -



For those of you who don’t have the time/the stomach to sit through this, it’s 6:40 of animals being maimed, neutered, electro-shocked and crushed alive - fully conscious and anaesthetic-free. Being shackled in racks smaller than they are, being forced to live in conditions so cramped they trample each other to death and are left to rot unnoticed. Being painfully, perpetually impregnated and then immediately separated from their babies (who often are left to scream for their mothers for days before being slaughtered). This is not footage from some overseas scandal about big-chain fast food providers. These are the practises being used by the largest farming companies and supermarket suppliers in the UK. By household names like ‘Bernard Matthews’ and ‘The Happy Egg company’. How is this acceptable?

If people treated their pets like this they’d be facing a fine, a ban from keeping animals and potential prison time.


'A gestation crate, also known as a sow stall, is a metal enclosure used in intensive pig farming, in which a female breeding pig (sow) may be kept during pregnancy and for most of her adult life'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestation_crate



If you haven't switched off already, I'm willing to bet the last thing you want is a lengthy sermon on the ethics of what you choose to have for dinner. So I’m not going to expend page space trying to convince you of these (well established) facts:

FACT: Eating too much meat sucks for your health (excessive red and processed meat slices years off our lives)
FACT: Eating too much meat is wrecking your surroundings (deforestation and production of methane gas is wrecking our environment)
FACT: Eating too much meat exacerbates world hunger (due to misdirection of grains and other resources)

Any casual Google search can do that for you. What I would like to discuss (by which I mean 'annihilate entirely'), are the routine arguments used to persuade people out of taking the V plunge. And why they’re a load of crap (incidentally, much like the supermarket milk which is currently available to us. A fresh glass of antibiotics, hormones, pesticides and pus anyone? Yummm.)

1.‘But meat tastes so good!’


Yes, yes it does. ‘Fancy a dirty kebab for breakfast? Hells yeah. ‘2am bacon cheese burger’? Hit me up. But - and maybe this is a product of growing up in a faith that promotes abstinence from sex, drugs and alcohol - to me, ‘I really enjoy it’ is just not an argument for pushing on with something you consider immoral. Also, you can still eat meat without perpetuating the highscale-horrific practises which are just an undivorceable reality of cheap meat. Yus, even if you’re skint. If you can’t afford to buy ethically produced meat at your current rate of consumption, just eat less of the stuff. It’s good for you.

2. ‘But you cutting that stuff out of your diet won’t even make any difference to the system you’re trying to change!’.

Wrong. Wrong wrong wrong. Food is a consumer industry. It’s driven by supply and demand. If people stop buying dirt cheap, mass produced meat then people will stop supplying it. If people start demanding ethically produced meat instead, then that’s what they’ll provide. And there are enough people making resolutions about 'responsible eating' for the industry to have already begun making changes. Every restaurant I’ve visited in the past 10 years has offered a vegetarian option. More than ever, menus state the sources of their meat. In London alone there are hundreds of restaurants marketing exclusively vegan/vegetarian food - and many more that serve only organically reared meat. No one who decides to go vegan/vegetarian/organic needs to be a lone wolf.


This question remains though - even if your actions count for nothing on a grand scale, is that a reason to continue participating in something you consider immoral? Like ‘you know what, I’m never going to be able to halt the people trafficking industry, so I think I’ll just go to town on an underage call girl. It’s not like me choosing to have consensual sex with a fellow adult instead is going to change anything anyway’. Is the principle not essentially the same? How do any large-scale reformations to immoral social/political/cultural/industrial practices come about? It’s through individuals resolving ‘I will have no part in this’.

3. ‘But people make a living out of producing meat this way! You’re putting their livelihood in jeopardy!’. 

Actually, changing the way we rear meat would INCREASE agricultural jobs. Organic farming requires MORE labourers than factory farming. Yes, there will be smaller profits for those at the very top, but there will be far greater employment opportunities for others.




So yeah. Some inconvenient truths I have had to come to terms with this week. In short, I have made the following resolutions:

1. Non-organic meat is off the menu.
2. Meat is on the menu once a week at most.
3. Free range eggs or bust.

And, most brutally,

4. No more dairy. That’s right. I feel strong enough about this to forsake camembert and ossau-iraty. Pray for me.




I was raised in a faith which teaches that humans are intended to be custodians over the Earth - guardians who are supposed to manage and look after the natural resources around us, not exploit them to the point of destruction. A faith that, long before we had scientific proof of the dangerous effects of over-eating meat, promoted eating meat ‘sparingly’ and only in times of nutritional need (https://www.lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/89?lang=eng). (Incidentally this revelation also advises “tobacco is not for the body, neither for the belly, and is not good for man” 100 years before science confirmed cigarettes are essentially coffin nails).




To the compassionate amongst you: please send me care packages of vegan cheese and Green and Blacks 85% cocoa dark chocolate. It’s milk free. And so am I.





Some P.S's:

Here's an article about the production of milk that I just find abhorrent (you're welcome):


And helpful info for anyone wanting to cut unethical meat out of their diets: